Villanova's scan site states that this the first printing of 1611. Ruth 3:15 shows "he went" into the City. The second printing fixed this to "she went".

https://digital.library.villanova.edu/Record/vudl:60609/Description

This might be a photocopy of a bible, BUT IT IS NOT A COPY OF THE ORIGINAL 1611 BIBLE. This is a much latter version of the bible that has been revised from the original version. You don't have to be a religious scholar to tell the difference. The main clue is the fact that the book is riddled with "typesetting" inserts that don't match the original text. The other hint that it is a bastardize version is missing the cover and several of the following pages are missing. However, on the first couple of blank pages you can see where the ink bleed through from the other side note copied.The original 1611 version in Greek or English would not have columns for notes.

Hmm, interesting, I did not know THAT.

I'm only now beginning to examine this text and I'll report back with any findings.

Song of Solomon 2:7 must read - "she please" not he like the Blayney mistake riddled KJV (cannot be KJV because KJ was dead in 1769!) You must Lamp in the Dark ytube channel - John Doerr who studied every single letter in the 1611. See the true1611bible.com for some nice flip books too.

seriously what is in this bible they don't want us to see...

I like it. You can also find individual books of the Bible extracted from the original 1611 version of the King James Bible here https://archive.org/details/GenesisKJV1611OriginalVersionBible and here https://archive.org/details/@sklal84&tab=uploads